The Wild Geese (11-Nov-1978)
Director: Andrew V. McLaglen Writer: Reginald Rose From novel: The Wild Geese by Daniel Carney Keywords: Drama
Name | Occupation | Birth | Death | Known for |
Richard Burton |
Actor |
10-Nov-1925 |
5-Aug-1984 |
Nineteen Eighty Four |
Jeff Corey |
Actor |
10-Aug-1914 |
16-Aug-2002 |
Little Big Man |
Frank Finlay |
Actor |
6-Aug-1926 |
30-Jan-2016 |
Othello |
Stewart Granger |
Actor |
6-May-1913 |
16-Aug-1993 |
King Solomon's Mines |
Richard Harris |
Actor |
1-Oct-1930 |
25-Oct-2002 |
English Bob in Unforgiven |
Percy Herbert |
Actor |
31-Jul-1920 |
6-Dec-1992 |
The Bridge on the River Kwai |
Hardy Krüger |
Actor |
12-Apr-1928 |
|
The Flight of the Phoenix |
David Ladd |
Actor |
5-Feb-1947 |
|
A Dog of Flanders |
Roger Moore |
Actor |
14-Oct-1927 |
23-May-2017 |
James Bond after Sean Connery |
Jack Watson |
Actor |
14-May-1915 |
4-Jul-1999 |
The Wild Geese |
REVIEWS Review by Walter Frith (posted on 7-Jun-2007) 'The Wild Geese' is really two movies combined into one. The first half
is about planning and the second half is about execution when
unexpected circumstances arise. It moves well with straight forward
story telling techniques and its action sequences are short and mixed
well with characters who are intelligent and whom the audience comes to
care for. I never saw it on the big screen. I was 13 years old when it
came out in 1978 and it has been a favourite of mine on the late show,
pay t.v., VHS, and now, finally, on DVD. It incorporates the basic
premise of Murphy's law meaning what can go wrong will go wrong. It's
about the chaos of any military situation and the missions of the
mercenary balanced against the angst of his opponents. The story
revolves around a group of former military men who are now mercenary
officers. Richard Burton stars as Col. Allen Faulkner, a man who will
work for the good guys or the bad guys as long as they pay him well. He
doesn't care. When he's not in the employ of a group with a top secret
mission to be carried out, he's an out of work drunk. He demands that
in order for the mission to even be considered for his undertaking that
those seeking his services find two other men. They are Capt. Rafer
Janders (Richard Harris) and Lt. Shawn Fynn (Roger Moore). The last
leading officer in the group is Lt. Pieter Coetze (Hardy Krüger), a
South African with a desire to fill his bank account and buy his own
farm back home. He is a friend of Fynn's who vouches for him and
recruits him accordingly. The four of them are charged with putting
together an elite mercenary group to go into a corrupt African nation
and rescue the rightful leader of the nation who is being held in a
prison camp and is thought to be dead by the people in his country. The
man at the top of the food chain who pays for the mission is Sir Edward
Matherson (Stewart Granger), a wealthy and unscrupulous London
businessman. He wants the rightful African leader returned to power so
he can execute a deal in that nation involving the riches of copper
mines which will bring great profit for his company. As the mission is
being planned and eventually carried out, a turn of events takes place
that puts the mission and its men in a position where they are fighting
not only to protect the African leader whom they have been sent to
rescue, but to save their own lives as well. I doubt the film will ever
play well with female audiences. Most I've talked to who have seen it
didn't like it. It's a quintessential "guy" movie with a great cast.
The biggest criticism the film received was the alleged miscasting of
Richard Burton as a mercenary. I couldn't disagree more. Burton was a
great actor who died too young and who plays his part in this movie as
a semi-washed up military professional who will do anything for money.
He is truly a despicable and visceral individual with honour,
surprisingly, and who treats others as well as he's treated. I suspect
the washed-up aspects of his character led to people misunderstanding
the way he played his part in this film. Burton left the world too soon
in 1984 when he died at the age of 59 from a cerebral hemorrhage.
Richard Harris is also deceased and his role in 'The Wild Geese' is
somewhat political. Not only is his character a mercenary like the
others but he is also an idealist. Someone not interested in the money
but the cause. Always on the side of the good guys or at least who he
perceives to by the good guys. Roger Moore is a supporting player in
this film and his antics in the James Bond movies makes him a perfect
fit for this role. Two sleeper performances that make the film a real
treat come from Jack Watson who plays RSM Sandy Young, the officer who
whips the men into shape for the mission and Stewart Granger as
Matherson, mentioned earlier and who is a symbol of today's growing
greed and misdeeds of corporations around the world. His part is
extremely small but deadly and effective. The dialogue in 'The Wild
Geese' sounds as if it was strictly enforced by the film's director,
Andrew V. McLaglen, as it doesn't look like many takes were done in
order to get the finished product. This doesn't make it mediocre, but
rather it gives it edge and respecting the writer, Reginald Rose in
this case, is beneficial to any movie. And also respectful to the
author of the novel on which the film is based.....Daniel Carney. 'The
Wild Geese' is superb entertainment that is plausible and carried out
with precision in its use of military weaponry, tactical procedures and
makes good use of the politics the story has contained within it. At
least these elements of the film are appealing to the average person
and what I love about movies like this is that you can tell that
multiple screenings took place by those who released the picture as it
is not boring for a second and every frame fits like a glove. From the
old age of cinema, it's nice to see a movie that has action sequences
that were produced with elbow grease and not a computer screen. What's
that old saying? "They don't make 'em like that anymore." Perfect
terminology for this somewhat forgotten classic in the action/adventure
genre. [Visit FILM FOLLOW-UP by Walter Frith]
Review by Andy Vagg (posted on 9-Nov-2007) This Film is absolute gold! Filmed in the late 70's it was a story of mercinaries, fighting for values above money, if you like. Whatever way you see it the morals and actions were out of time and place, all the "good guys" had a rather 1940's sense of honour, and te officers and nco's had that stiff upper lip quality.
The storyis a duel story, the 1st about the men, their backgrounds and relationships.The 2nd is about the gung ho good vs evil battle, between big business/African dictators and emergig african politics.
Looking back now, it all seems a bit cliche'd with the kindly whites helping the noble Africans, who manage to convert a 70's white South Afrian away from apparthied ,and to then throw down his life to save his black leader.
This film works because, it does not try to be serious about African politics or about the way the west treated African nations, it works as a rip roaring action flick about a few against many, good vs evil and freindship. So sit back, watch it and just enjoy it for wha it is, a bloody good war film!
Do you know something we don't?
Submit a correction or make a comment about this profile
Copyright ©2019 Soylent Communications
|